Showing posts with label Sandy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Sandy. Show all posts

Thursday, June 14, 2012

Except that it is all wrong, Well Done!

Charles Manson gang linked to death of man found with wrists slashed in supposed suicide in 1960s London

  • Suspicions that Joel Pugh’s death in west London could have been ordered by evil mass killer Manson
  • U.S. detectives stumble on a treasure trove of new clues that could solve 43-year-old mystery
  • Los Angeles police handed cassettes of conversations between one of Manson’s most fervent followers and his lawyer

By David Gardner

|


New evidence being investigated by police in Los Angeles may link the apparent suicide of a man in London to the notorious Charles Manson murder family.

There has been a lingering suspicion that 29-year-old Joel Pugh’s death in West London’s Talgarth Hotel in December 1969 could have been a hit ordered by one of history’s most evil mass killers.

Now detectives believe they have stumbled on a treasure trove of new clues that could shed more light on the 43-year-old mystery.

New link: Sandra Good with Joel Pugh (pictured in 1969) who was found dead at the Talgarth Hotel in West London amid suspicions he was murdered at the order of cult leader Charles Manson - Sandra was a member of Manson's 'Family'

New link: Sandra Good with Joel Pugh (pictured in 1969) who was found dead at the Talgarth Hotel in West London amid suspicions he was murdered at the order of cult leader Charles Manson - Sandra was a member of Manson's 'Family'

A US Bankruptcy Court in Texas this week granted a request by Los Angeles Police to review eight cassette tapes containing hours of conversation between Charles ‘Tex’ Watson – one of Manson’s most fervent followers – and his lawyer.

The recordings represent the first new clues in the case in decades and experts believe they could yield evidence supporting Manson’s boasts that his sick family killing spree claimed more than the nine known victims.

‘Manson told one of his cellmates his followers committed as many as 35 murders,’ said Stephen Kay, who prosecuted the cult leader.

Mr Pugh’s death was ruled as a suicide by the British authorities, who said the young American boyfriend of Manson devotee Sandra Good had been depressed.

Tapes: Newly recovered recording of Charles Manson (pictured in 2011) by the California Department of Corrections are to be examined
Charles Manson en route to a Los Angeles courtroom on in December, 1970

Crazed: Charles Manson (left) last year ahead of a parole hearing in California and in 1970 (right) taken shortly after he was convicted of conspiring to murder seven people

But Mr Kay is convinced he was murdered by a Manson follower. The victim was found naked except for a sheet with his throat slit and his wrist slashed.

‘Manson despised him – and people who Manson hated ended up dead,’ added Mr Kay.

Nobody knows yet what’s on the tapes, but discovering their existence was enough for Los Angeles detectives to re-open the case.

Officers believe Watson ‘may have discussed additional unsolved murders committed by followers of Charles Manson,’ according to a letter sent to the US Justice Department by Los Angeles Police Chief Charlie Beck.

‘Do we expect to find something in the recordings? We just don't know,' said LAPD Commander Andrew Smith. ‘But we're going to check just like any good investigator would.’

Proven: Actress Sharon Tate who died August, 1969, was murdered by Charles Manson and his cult followers

Tragic victim: Pregnant actress Sharon Tate who died August, 1969, was murdered by Charles Manson and his cult followers

Police also suspect more bodies of Manson family victims may have been buried under their one-time hideout at the Barker Ranch in Death Valley, one of the world’s hottest places.

The serial killer and five members of his so-called ‘Family’ are serving life terms for the 1969 murders of nine people, including the pregnant Sharon Tate, wife of film director Roman Polanski.

Now 74, Manson is imprisoned in a California where he has had a swastika carved crudely into his forehead.

Retired Los Angeles police sergeant Paul Whiteley, who investigated the Manson-ordered slaying of musician Gary Hinman in 1969, says: ‘I’m almost certain Joel Pugh was murdered in England by a Manson Family member called Bruce Davis.

‘We know he was in London at the same time and we heard from an informant that The Family had struck in Britain, but we were never able to get Scotland Yard interested in the case. I spoke to them and they just wouldn’t listen.

‘We were, frankly, amazed the police in England had decided it was a suicide and refused even to consider foul play.'

Sunday, November 07, 2010

The Dynamic Says It All


If you want my opinion, Paul Fitzgerald was a good lawyer who believed the Family bullshit a little too much.
If we look at this photo we see what I mean. Is Nancy in charge? What is she at this point, 25 and she and Sandy look like they own the fucking joint. WHY is Paul even considering dealing with these two stoned hotties?

FOUR people are on trial for their lives. WHO CARES what their friends have to say?

Uggh.

Thursday, June 04, 2009

Dave Edwards is a Spazz


Okay, so we let the Pugh guy post here, and join here and he doesn't like it here. He can stay or go that's up to him. But first I want to get to the bottom of something? Can he read?

--------------
Back in May there was a comment in the section that reprinted the original article- by member Force 17. It read...

Simon Wells has written a book called Coming down fast and he has done some original research on this rather than another cut and paste job. Dont think it has a US release yet.

In the letter Dave Edwards wrote us, he defensively states that his article is not a cut and paste job. Fine. The comment is clearly referring to other books like the GoRightly one and two others.

-------------
Dave responds to my comments. One of his comments is

Of course newspapers aren't necessarily right but they've always been, and remain, forums of free expression. Sure, sometimes articles are skewed to toe a particular line but this wasn't the case with my piece.

Dave- If you've taken a look around you will see that this site, Bret's site and Cat's site all have one thing in common. We want the truth. A tabloid newspaper wants to be sold. It doesn't, by definition, care about the truth. We do....

I'm sorry, but nothing in my piece expresses admiration for Vincent Bugliosi. Incidentally, didn't Susan Atkins refer to him as the 'Bug'? I really, really hope that you haven't taken to quoting her. That would suggest this is a pro-Manson site rather than something more even-handed.

...And we have been able to, via research and actual free thinking, establish that someone who stalked his milkman thinking he was his son's birth father, who assaulted his mistress and who made up a bullshit motive for the crime of the century should not be trusted, cited or referred to. The moment you cite BUGliosi you lose. Because he is the cause of all the lies out there. His win at any cost ploys helped him to win (although ironically tied him to Manson for life) and helped us lose out on understanding what really happened. And you stand corrected- all of the Family referred to him as BUGliosi (not just Susan, even though BUG dwells on her in his novel). We are not pro Manson. For the record I once again state- Charlie Manson was a short, charasmatic, con artist, a punk who had spent 18 years taking it in the ass. When he got out he continued a life of petty crime. And he never KILLED anybody, so painting him as Satan, as Bug does, is just bullshit. So face that truth, Mr. Edwards. It's where the facts actually start.

If British tabloids really are as bad as you suggest, why on earth are you reprinting my loathsome, inaccurate and sensationalist article? And as far as a response goes, how about sending something to the letters page? It's not hard to do. Try google. Alternatively, there's a forum for comments on the paper's website.

Well Dave, I reprinted it so we can examine and dissect it- not because I assumed that it was the truth because the great Dave wrote it! And why do I care to respond to the paper? Are they official? We are! And why comment on the site? I don't care about the site at all.

This has me at a total loss. And what's with the swearword? This blog follows every twist and turn of the Manson story, happily devoting thousands of words to unsubstantiated rumours but then gets its knickers in a bunch when someone goes out and does some investigative reporting. The reason I looked into Joel's life was because I wanted to tell his story which, as far as I'm aware, had never been properly told. Why has that created such animosity?

Total loss? No doubt. Swear word? Aren't you a grown up? Unsubstantiated rumors? Not sure what you mean but if so I will FUCKING swear that I labelled them as such. Unlike- well, you. Telling Joel's story is a good idea... the question we are discussing is, did you? It appears many people think not. Sorry.

As far as 'sticking around' and learning the truth goes, rest assured, I'll do just that but I'm starting to thin this isn't the place to do it.

Ah, well, there you go. I'm sorry we didn't bow down and accept your tabloid article as God's word.
But at least we got that picture out of it!
Oh and as far as your "truth" goes, Cats from the other great site has a letter for you- she don't think much of your shit either-

Dear Mr. Dave Edwards,

I take note of your presence here yesterday reading this thread, then alas, you appear on the Colonel's site addressing what we have posted here concerning your article.

I take offense to what you said concerning us here, and we do not have hostility nor think we know everything about the TLB case. We just call bullshit bullshit and I am sorry that you did not deem it necessary to address us here on the points made in this thread. You are a member and can post.

The autopsy report has been seen, and Simon too has spoken to Joel's brother Daniel.

The infamous letter with the line about what happened to Joel not happening to the writer is reproduced in full in Simon's book, and when taken into proper context and seeing the letter in full, that single solitary line doesn't mean what has been gathered all these years.

Cats

----------David Gets Snarky in The Comments, Col Dissects----------

Gosh, my own thread. I’m honoured.If the guy could READ he would notice this is his THIRD thread.

Colonel,It's COL thanks I’ve read your comments and, after due consideration, I want to apologise. The points you’ve raised are not only pertinent, beautifully put and well argued; they’re also accurate. You mean this as a snarky asshole, but in fact are correct.

This isn’t easy for me to do but… I want to say sorry. no you don't. This makes you a liar.

First, I want to apologise for writing an article about the Manson case without seeking your permission. I thought it was about Joel Pugh- and you still keep being a smug limey asshole..Given how you, and you alone, possess the truth, I WISH I possessed the truth it was simply inexcusable. After much soul-searching, I’ve realised that somehow I have become part of the Great Media Conspiracy that has turned a basically nice guy like Charlie into the devil incarnate. The media didn't do this, BUGliosi did- with Charlie's complicity. LEARN TO READ.

May I also apologise for quoting Vincent Bugliosi who (you’re absolutely right) knows nothing about the case. Hey guys, CAN THIS GUY READ? I never said he knows nothing- he knows quite a lot. What he SAYS cannot be trusted though. You, Susan Atkins and the others are absolutely right -- he really is a bit of a ‘BUG’, isn’t he?He's a lying, woman attacking former DA.

I also want to – hand on heart – apologise if I suggested your website was in any way pro-Family or that you’re a Manson apologist.Anyone that could READ would realize this isn't true. That’s clearly not the case at all. Having looked over your site, it’s now clear to me that Manson is an unfortunate, misunderstood and largely harmless individual who should be freed immediately so he can spread his gospel of peace, love and death.See what I mean, loser- no where does it say that- too bad you cannot READ. Sure, he may have directed the residents of Spahn to commit mass murder,likely did not he may have tied up the terrified LaBiancas not "may"- didbefore they were horrifically killed, he may have orchestrated the murder of Shorty Shea depends on what you mean by orchestrated, he may have sliced off Gary Hinman’s ear,Hinman's corpse clearly has an ear in the autopsy record so he DID NOT do this he may have shot Lotsapoppa did, he may have raped teenage girls who found themselves at Spahn,we can agree to disagree about this he may have ordered the murder of poor Joel except he didn't and NOBODY but you, the poor reader, thinks that he did.but, as you rightly say, he was merely a short, ‘charasmatic’ con artist. Boy, did I get my facts wrong!And you continue to. Again, I’m sorry.

Sometimes it takes a man to stand up and admit his mistakesWell since you are a poorly educated limey fool who could only sell his 6 months of work to a British tabloid, let me know when you find a man. Well, I’m doing just that. Colonel, you’re truly a one-off. A fearless seeker of the truth and someone clearly unafraid to courageously ask the big questions that most shy away from.This is accurate May I also compliment you on your spelling and grammar – you’re also a commander of the English language. My prose is pretty solid, thanks. You CAN'T FUCKING READ so please don't try to teach.I salute you! I’m also glad you haven’t lost your sense of humour during our tête-à-tête. I can’t remember the last time I was called a ‘Spazz’ but I think it was in a playground.No. It was yesterday. By me. Because? Well, you are a spazz. Anyway reading your letter thinks to themselves "Wow, what a spazz!"

Peace, brother, and fingers crossed Charlie, Susan, Linda and all the other victims of disinformation in the media finally win their long overdue parole. God I hope Susan never gets out. Charlie never will no matter what I hope. And Linda IS NOT IN JAIL.... SPAZZZZZZZZ!



The Guy Who Wrote The Pugh Article writes to us (and joins us?)


Hi everyone,

Apologies for leaving it so late but I thought I'd respond to all your comments regarding my article. Very briefly, I spent six months writing the piece.

I've been a journalist for the past 13 years and came up with the idea of writing a piece on Joel Pugh after re-reading Helter Skelter last year. Over many, many nights, I contacted Ed Sanders, Vincent Bugliosi, Curt Gentry and others looking for leads. They were all extremely helpful and, after a very, very long time, I was able to contact Joel's brother, Dan, to find out a little about what became of him. I then put together the article you now see and placed it with a newspaper.

While I'm proud to have been the first to piece together the life and times of Joel (a warm, witty and idiosyncratic guy), I'm bemused at the hostility my article has caused. This is something I noticed on many of the Manson websites. It's as if there's a hardcore of people who believe they know the truth of the murders who dismiss those who come up with anything off their radar. I can understand this given all the disinformation out there but, still, the patronizing air is stifling. I'm as fascinated as them about the killings but am not arrogant enough to think I'm the sole keeper of the Tate/Labianca flame.

Incidentally, if the webmaster sees fit to post all my hard work here, I'm offended s/he uses the intro 'but how much do I believe?' Why didn't they have the courtesy to get in touch with me first? I'd have been happy to answer any questions they had. Believe it or not, I didn't make this piece up. Every word was drawn from first-hand testimony, contemporaneous newspaper reports and documents.

As far as Force 17's comments go, may I suggest s/he actually reads my article, which is comprised entirely of original research. It's depressing when people dismiss newspaper articles as 'cut and paste jobs' but even more depressing when the critics don't appear to have actually read them.

As for Simon Wells' book, I finished reading it this week. I thought it was an interesting summary of the phenomenon that, rightly, steered away from the whole Helter Skelter mythology. I notice on other websites he's unhappy at my article, suggesting I've twisted the facts to make a suicide look like a murder. Again, the criticisms are delivered in a familiarly patronizing tone, suggesting I've trivialized Joel's life and death for tabloid readers. I refute this and refer Simon to the blurb on the back of his own book that refers to 'new evidence linking a cult member to a murder in London'. Murder, huh?

Having spent a long time perusing this site, it seems clear the users have a distinct distrust of the media (just like Manson himself, incidentally). That doesn't mean all newspaper articles are wrong.


David Edwards


------

Col Writes-

Nor does it mean that they are right. You start off expressing admiration for BUGliosi who wrote a self-aggrandizing book full of lies. How should we respond? That newspaper is a UK Tabloid. How should we respond? You decided out of a clear blue fucking sky to do a story about Joel Pugh- it doesn't get more obscure than that. How should we respond?


Welcome to the Blog. Stick around and you might learn a thing or two.

Friday, March 20, 2009

The Most We Have Ever Heard About This Guy

but how much do I believe? (I'm not gonna reset the photos, they look purty where they are and you can just deal with it)

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

Did Charles Manson's murder gang strike in Britain?

By David Edwards

Hotel manager Joseph Falk discovered the blood-soaked body of the 29-year-old man at 6pm.

Joel Pugh had checked into the Talgarth Hotel, West London, five weeks before.

He was a genial young man who kept himself to himself.

He could often be heard playing his guitar through his door, which he never locked.

Yet in the weeks leading up to that day, December 2, 1969, he had seemed increasingly withdrawn.

Charles Manson
Charles Manson

Faces of evil: Charles Manson aged 74 (left) and as a 34-year-old in 1969 (right)

When the maid found his ground-floor room locked that Tuesday morning, Falk took it upon himself to enter with a pass-key.

‘It only opened about one foot,’ he later told police. ‘There seemed to be a weight behind it. I felt what seemed like an arm.’

A police constable was sent to the hotel in Hammersmith just after 6pm.

Inside the room he discovered Joel’s body lying on the floor, the walls covered in blood. Naked except for a sheet, his throat had been slit twice and his wrists slashed.

A week later, an inquest heard how notes containing bizarre mirror writing were found near his body, together with a hash pipe, leading a psychiatrist from nearby St Bernard’s Hospital to speculate Joel was suffering from depression.

As far as the coroner was concerned this was nothing more than a tragic suicide. Case closed.

Now, 40 years on, the Mail has uncovered evidence suggesting Joel did not die by his own hand but was murdered at the orders of cult leader Charles Manson.

The notorious serial killer and five members of his so-called ‘Family’ are serving life terms for the 1969 murders of nine people, including the pregnant Sharon Tate, wife of film director Roman Polanski.

Now 74, Manson is imprisoned in a California jail — and a picture of him released this week shows his chilling gaze remains, as does a swastika carved crudely into his forehead.

Sandra Good and Joel Pugh

Manson link: Sandra Good and Joel Pugh, who was found dead in 1969

Manson has hinted he was responsible for many more deaths — including a dozen people who may have known too much about his grisly crimes.

Retired LA police sergeant Paul Whiteley, who investigated the Manson-ordered slaying of musician Gary Hinman in 1969, says: ‘I’m almost certain Joel Pugh was murdered in England by a Manson Family member called Bruce Davis.

‘We know he was in London at the same time and we heard from an informant that The Family had struck in Britain, but we were never able to get Scotland Yard interested in the case. I spoke to them and they just wouldn’t listen.

‘We were, frankly, amazed the police in England had decided it was a suicide and refused even to consider foul play.

‘The crime scene was so similar to the one found in Sharon Tate’s house. I still think, even to this day, that Davis got away with murder on Manson’s behalf.’

Despite having been in prison since his arrest in 1969, Manson and his nightmarish crimes still exert a powerful psychological grip on America, where rumours he may have been responsible for dozens of other killings are taken seriously.

Last May, police excavated plots at Barker Ranch in Death Valley, Manson’s last hideout, looking for the remains of further victims, although none were found.

So how did a respectable boy like Joel Pugh find himself at the mercy of Manson’s cult? Tragically, his association with The Family came about through an infatuation he developed with a young blonde called Sandra Good.

After graduating from the University of Minnesota in 1962, Joel served two years in the U.S. Army. After leaving the military, he moved to San Francisco, California. It was here, while working as a lab technician, that Joel, 24, met Sandra, a stockbroker’s daughter.

Author Gerard Jones, who was then dating Sandra’s older sister, Ginny, remembers meeting the couple at the home of the girls’ father.

‘Joel was frail and sweet,’ says Gerard, now 66. ‘I remember thinking of him as a pleasant fellow and thought how lucky Sandra was to have met such a nice guy.’

Wedding between actress Sharon Tate and film director Roman Polanski at Chelsea register office in 1968

Famous death: Sharon Tate, married to Roman Polanski, was killed by Manson

Sandra, who was four years younger than Joel, was a troubled young woman who, like so many of her generation, was searching for a purpose. Early in 1968, that purpose arrived when a friend offered to fly her to L.A. to meet a guitar-playing hippy known variously as The Wizard, The Soul, Jesus Christ — or, more simply, Charlie Manson.

Paroled from jail in March 1967, after several convictions for armed robbery and car theft, Manson had moved to San Francisco where the Summer Of Love was about to explode.

With dreams of becoming a famous musician like his idols, The Beatles, he set about creating a harem of willing young women whom he controlled through a combination of psychobabble and LSD.

The following April, Sandra joined what was later dubbed ‘The Family’ and became one of Manson’s most devoted followers. Her on-off boyfriend was less enamoured. Joel’s brother, Daniel Pugh tells me: ‘Sandra really wanted Joel to get to know Manson, but Joel didn’t want to. He thought Manson was a complete creep. He couldn’t accept Sandra’s association with him.’

The Family started out as a supposedly idealist commune rejecting conventional values such as materialism and monogamy in favour of ‘free love’. For a short time in 1968, their members even included Beach Boy Dennis Wilson, who was entranced by Manson’s charisma.

Gerard Jones says: ‘I’d hear what Sandra was up to from Ginny. Like how she was seeing Joel, or was off in the desert, or staying at one of The Beach Boys’ houses.

Charles Manson

Behind bars: Manson in the 80s

‘Before all the murders, everything we heard about what Sandra was doing with Manson was very positive. It was like: “Wow, she’s doing cool things and staying with pop stars.”’

But troubled times were ahead. Daniel Pugh recalls: ‘Joel’s relationship with Sandy [as Sandra was also known] became very on-and-off.

‘Joel got it into his head he needed to fulfil himself. He was fascinated with zoology — so our dad bankrolled a trip for him to Brazil in 1968 and then another, the year after, to North Africa.’

During his second expedition, Joel experienced a bout of depression. After befriending a California tourist called Harriet Smith, he journeyed with her to Spain and then on to London. He checked into the Talgarth Hotel, on what’s now the A4, on October 27.

Daniel heard nothing from his brother during his stay in London but later pieced together his final weeks when he visited London in September 1971.

‘Harriet said Joel spent most of the time in his room and that she couldn’t get him to go out to see the sights of London,’ he says. ‘It was only later we learned that one of the Manson Family was staying just outside London at the same time.’

While Joel had been on his travels, life in The Family had taken a highly sinister turn. Frustrated at his failure to break into the music business, Manson had taken to listening repeatedly to The Beatles’ 1968 double-LP, known as The White Album. Tracks such as Blackbird, Piggies and especially Helter Skelter convinced Manson the band were sending him messages warning of an impending race war.

Convinced The Family would be the only white survivors of the looming apocalypse, an increasingly unstable Manson proclaimed himself the Messiah and ordered his followers to leave L.A. for the bleak canyons of Death Valley where they would sit out the imminent battle.

Inconveniently, the war had not begun by the summer of 1969, prompting him to order his disciples to kick-start it by committing the most brutal murders in American history.

On August 8, Manson followers Susan Atkins, Patricia Krenwinkel and Charles Watson broke into a house in Beverly Hills and murdered Sharon Tate, socialite Abigail Folger, hairdresser Jay Sebring, Polish writer Wojciech Frykowski and 18-year-old Steven Parent.

The following night, Watson, Krenwinkel and fellow Manson devotee Leslie Van Houten stabbed to death the racehorse owner Leno LaBianca and his wife Rosemary at their L.A. home. In both cases, the attackers sought to blame the slayings on members of the Black Panthers — the Black Power organisation — by writing racially charged slogans on the walls using the victims’ blood.

The idea was to so outrage the white community that they would take up arms and thus start a race war.

While the world recoiled at the sheer savagery of the murders — Frykowski, for example, was stabbed 51 times — several other people loosely connected with The Family started to meet grisly, unexpected deaths in the following months.

On the evening of November 5, 1969, police were called to a house in L.A. where they found the body of John Philip Haught, a member of The Family, lying on a mattress with a bullet hole in his right temple and a revolver nearby.

Also in the room were four other Family members — including one Bruce Davis, a drifter from Alabama, who had become Manson’s fixer and right-hand man. They all claimed John had died while playing Russian roulette. Bizarrely, the officers believed the story, despite the fact the gun was fully loaded and had been wiped of prints.

Manson

Mad man: Manson pulls a face during his California trial in 1969

Then on November 16, the body of an unnamed teenage girl — who was widely thought to have been a former Family member but never formally identified — was found in a ditch with 157 stab wounds.

Just five days later, the stabbed bodies of 15-year-old James Sharp and Doreen Gaul, 19, were found in an L.A. alleyway. Doreen had once been a girlfriend of Bruce Davis, whose whereabouts at the time of the deaths remains unknown.

It is easy to see how Joel’s death fits in with the pattern of these killings. Many of these victims were once close to The Family — but were now drifting away from its clutches. Manson wreaked his bloody revenge on them and their newfound friends.

Joel’s relationship with Sandra had broken down and he had left his association with The Family behind him. This meant that he too was now, in Manson’s eyes, an enemy — and a traitor of The Family’s twisted cause.

Local district attorney Frank Fowles was concerned about the activities of The Family. He contacted Interpol to discover what Manson’s right-hand man, Davis had been up to. He learned that Davis had made a connection in the UK some months back with another controversial group, the Scientology religion.

Records showed Davis had been staying at a Scientology retreat in Felbridge, Surrey, before returning to the U.S. on April 25, 1969.

A letter sent to Fowles by Scotland Yard read: ‘It has been established that Davis is recorded as embarking at London airport for the United States of America on April 25, 1969, while holding United States passport 612 2568.

'At this time he gave his address as Dormer Cottage, Felbridge, Surrey. This address is owned by the Scientology movement and houses the religion’s followers.’

The letter continued: ‘The local police understand that he has visited our country more recently than April

1969. However, this is not borne out by our official records.’

Although Davis’ movements are hazy, researchers say he returned to England for more Scientology training on November 23, staying here for two months.

Curt Gentry, co-author of Helter Skelter, an account of the Manson murders and trial, says: ‘The one person who travelled more than anyone in The Family was Davis, who kept all the members’ stolen credit cards and phoney IDs.

'Joel Pugh’s death has always struck me as more than a suicide since Davis was in the UK at around the same time.

‘Davis was a fanatical follower of Manson and the kind of person who would be sent to do this.’

The coroner’s report of Joel’s death has long since been lost, so details of his last days are confined largely to two local newspaper reports of his inquest.

Under the headline: ‘Death notes in mirror’, the Fulham Chronicle of December 12 reports how a concerned Falk entered Joel’s room: ‘Entering with a pass-key, Mr Falk found he could only open the door a few inches and there was blood on the walls. He called the police who found Mr Pugh on the floor with a razor blade about two feet from him.

‘Also in the room the police found a pipe containing cannabis resin and several notes. But the notes were not suicide notes. Many were written in mirror writing and could only be read by holding them in front of a mirror.

‘A psychiatrist who saw the notes said that little could be evaluated from them except that they were suggestive of depression.’

Vincent Bugliosi, the L.A. County assistant district attorney who prosecuted Manson, remains troubled at how the Metropolitan Police didn’t investigate the death fully. He says: ‘While the case resembled a suicide, it looked, and still looks, like murder to me. Nobody thought the drawings or writings were important enough to take down.

‘Nobody thought it important to establish a time of death and, even though Pugh’s room was on the ground floor and thus could have been entered by a window, nobody bothered checking for prints. It’s now unlikely the mystery will ever be solved.’

Davis, 66, is now an inmate at the California Men’s Colony prison, 200 miles north of Los Angeles, where he’s serving two life sentences for murder.

The first is for the slaying of Gary Hinman, a musician and small-time drug dealer who was tortured for two days by Davis and other Family members who wanted his money.

The second is for the murder of ranch-hand Donald ‘Shorty’ Shea, who Manson believed was a police informer.

Davis has never spoken publicly about Joel’s death, but then there’s little incentive for him to do so since the sheer horror of his crimes means he’s unlikely ever to be released. Last September he was refused parole for the 25th time.

When I wrote to him, he replied to say he did not conduct media interviews, instead enclosing a pamphlet detailing how he became a Christian in 1974. Interestingly, the tract reveals how, like Joel, he travelled to North Africa, Spain and England sometime in 1969.

And Joel’s ex-girlfriend Sandra Good, who turned 65 last month, is also silent. After Manson was incarcerated, he set up a bizarre environmental group called Air, Trees, Water, Animals (ATWA). Sandra supports this movement — and ATWA’s website denies Joel was murdered.

It says: ‘Joel Pugh is described as a “former Manson Family member”. He never met Manson or any of the other so-called Family members. After Pugh’s death, his parents journeyed to London to satisfy themselves with the official verdict of suicide.

‘After checking all the medical records and the files at Scotland Yard they were satisfied the death was, indeed, a suicide.’

Although she had no part in any Manson murders, Sandra has repeatedly said she respects those who committed them and showed her solidarity with The Family’s new environmental ‘cause’ in 1975 when she was jailed for ten years for conspiracy to send threatening letters to businessmen she accused of polluting the environment.

As revealed by author Curt Gentry, soon after Manson’s arrest a letter by an unknown Family member was discovered in a flat Sandra rented that contained the line: ‘I would not want what happened to Joel to happen to me.’

Joel’s family may never know what really happened to the good-natured, quirky boy who set off for adventures in distant lands in 1969, never to return. Until Davis finally comes clean, their agony will continue.