data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c982e/c982ef07a551b1052f4d3e4030ec4d805b3d4ef3" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/463f9/463f920eb78f8d5633843515ae06044c69ba55cb" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8d737/8d7370e543e0cca7c12ceaf55a653ce032e813bc" alt=""
Sooo.... I am continually amazed by things people claimed back then with a straight face that were taken as true. In some cases they are still considered true, even if no human would ever seriously believe them. I am talking about Juan Flynn's assertion that he knew about the killings but it was okay. Uh huh.
Also today we see Melcher get away with easy questions... and most of the press seems to believe Charlie thought he still lived there. It explains Tate a lot more readily than believing the BUG's novel.
Finally we have the NY TIMES from the day of the Bruce Davis surrender, the first youtube I ever posted. It claims that Nancy was married to Bruce. I don't recall that. Anyone know if this is true?