Tuesday, August 01, 2006

Tex Ministry Expose 2

No I don't know what happened ultimately. I think Kristen divorced his ass. But she had FOUR kids with him I think. I think conjugals got cut back or eliminated. Who knows out there? Tell us in the comments. The Col cares about the crime, not tracing Tex's sperm from jail.

22 comments:

Salem said...

yes Kristen finally left the LOSER!

Salem said...

I think Tex failed to get the money and was burned by Voy, just as Bobby was burned by Hinman..
The so called family needed money to get away back to the dessert far away....last resort was C's contact Frank Carbo who Leno owed money too, and I do think the murder there at the Leno's was a drug miafia hit.
jmop

4Sharon said...

Wow, sounds like a Mafia hit to me! For the Bianca's anyway.

4Sharon said...

Wow, sounds like a Mafia hit to me! For the Bianca's anyway.

uncle ace said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
agnostic monk said...

What is up with Charlie anyway? He's contributing to these conspiracy theories about mob hits with the information he is giving, confirming his link to Leno Balianca via mobsters from jail. He's talking about little black books, etc.

But then in other interviews he had nothing to do with any of the murders.

If Charlie was carrying out hits for his old friends, he's just as guilty as if he was trying to start Helter Skelter.

He can't have it both ways. So which is it?

catscradle77 said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Salem said...

i think they ate food there, as a way of showing they werent eating out the garbage dumps from Grocery stores like Leno owned.
The dress was to make Rosemary up to look like the high flautin* person she was.
jmop

Salem said...

high flauting*
southern slang.......

Salem said...

Monk says
If Charlie was carrying out hits for his old friends, he's just as guilty as if he was trying to start Helter Skelter.

How so?

agnostic monk said...

What do you mean "how so?" I'll try to simplify it.

Charlie instructs Tex to take the girls to Tate/Labianca and kill everyone for the purpose of starting Helter Skelter.

Or...

Charlie instructs Tex to take the girls to Tate/Labianca and kill everyone for the purpose of settling a mob score.

The only difference between the two scenarios is the REASON for doing it. The operative phrase is "instructs Tex to kill".

Does that make sense? Either way, Charlie = guilty.

Salem said...

Charlie instructs Tex to take the girls to Tate/Labianca and kill everyone for the purpose of starting Helter Skelter.

neither Monk.
Charlie goes to get the lil black book.
I dont think murder was intended.
Just robbery.

Salem said...

and when they couldnt find what they were after , Tex began to KILL again.

agnostic monk said...

Salem, we are having a disconnect. I wasn't talking about your opinion that Manson didnt order the murders. I was merely comparing the two scenarios "instructed them to murder for Helter Skelter" and "instructed them to murder for mob hit". Either way, "instructed them to murder" stands.

You asked me what I meant by what I posted and that's what I meant. Perhaps you are correct and neither is true.

agnostic monk said...

Salem said...
>>>and when they couldnt find what they were after , Tex began to KILL again.<<<

Yeah, AFTER Charlie split like a weasel. Gee I wonder why Charlie took off. It couldn't possibly have anything to do with the fact that he thought some blood might be shed. After all, it's not like Charlie was fully aware that Tex and Patricia had slit a bunch of people open with knives and a gun the night before or anything.

Ooops.

Deb said...

Colonel thanks for these tapes. How old are they?

Can you order a copy of Tex Watson's divorce judgment from the courthouse like you ordered Paul Tate's will? I would try but I am a Canadian so they might not be so accomodating... there some info on Mark Turner's site. I think they split in either 2003 or 2004

jollywest said...

I am just throwing this out for thought. If the Labianca murder was a mob hit, then the Helter Skelter angle could have been used to protect the mob from being fingered or connected to the crime. The reason Paul may have been interrogated by a "mafia man" was to make sure that his testimony would not implicate the mob.

Pristash said...

By jolly, jollywest, I think you've got it...or are at least as close to the truth as we can get without somebody coming clean.

Salem said...

Jolly West said...
I am just throwing this out for thought. If the Labianca murder was a mob hit, then the Helter Skelter angle could have been used to protect the mob from being fingered or connected to the crime. The reason Paul may have been interrogated by a "mafia man" was to make sure that his testimony would not implicate the mob.

9:44 PM

cuz yanno, Vinnie probally had some great mob conections.
:)
,me

Salem said...

jollywest said...
I am just throwing this out for thought. If the Labianca murder was a mob hit, then the Helter Skelter angle could have been used to protect the mob from being fingered or connected to the crime. The reason Paul may have been interrogated by a "mafia man" was to make sure that his testimony would not implicate the mob.

:)

Yepyep said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Eddy said...

I don't agree yepyep. The press had a field day with all the victims before the name "Manson" was ever known. Go back and read reports from August-December 1969. The press massacred the victims and their lifestyles over and over again.