I know, some of you wish I would stop the obsession with the errors of KTS. But after half a month of almost no posts, followed by banal "why aren't they rescuing the kitty cats too?" posts, they finally post something new, a Friday Case Fact...
As attorney for defendant Leslie Van Houten, Hughes tried to separate the interests of his client from those of Charles Manson. He hoped to show that Van Houten was not acting independently, but was completely controlled in her actions by Manson.
Hughes decision to pursue an independent strategy almost certainly cost him his life. On the last weekend of November, 1970, Hughes disappeared while camping in a remote area near Sespe Hot Springs. His badly decomposed body was not discovered until four months later. Although no one was ever charged with the murder of Hughes, at least two Family members have admitted that the killing of Hughes was a "retaliation murder" by Manson.
Except not a word of it is true. He drowned in an area where there was flash flooding. He was obese and could not get away. NO ONE including Bug still believes he was murdered.
Think logically- if there were retaliation murders why did they stop? Who was retaliated against? Why not kill Bug or Kay?
Why does KTS continue to promote untruth?. This is from a Lisa, but it could just as easily be from that Old Goat Janice.
I mean- have a commitment to your subject!