Saturday, April 22, 2006
JOE has some questions
Buried among the comments by the Turner retards, a man called JOE asks three questions worthy of spotlighting.
1.Manson had an arsenal of weapons including rifles and a machine gun. So, if he really wanted a massacre -- forget about WHO he sent to the Tate house for a minute -- WHY did he send them with the rickitiest, lamest gun in the cache?
2. The LaBianca's phone lines weren't cut, Leno was tied at the wrists, and Rosemary wasn't even tied up, so why the hell didn't they immidiately call the cops when Manson left them alone?
3. If Ronnie Howard, Virginia Graham and Danny DeCarlo could testify on the stand about what the murderers told them about their crimes, why would -- as Bug wrote in HS -- Joe Sage's testimony about Linda's confession in New Mexico
1- One of the KEY questions for real scholars of the case. UNLESS it was all supposed to be a threat and it went wrong. Otherwise, who the hell sends teenage girls anyway?
2- No idea. Unless they knew Charlie. OR knew who sent Charlie.
3- The Hearsay exception to the rules of evidence only applies to first generation testimony. So Danny lying about what Charlie told him Charlie supposedly did- Okay. Brooks testifying about what Charlie said about himself- okay. The Whores testifying what Susan said she did- fine. And whatever Linda told Joe SHE did is okay too. But remember, BUG wants Charlie. Whatever Joe SAYS Linda SAID Charlie DID- not eligible. Your answers?